Shouldn’t be any spoilers here, though I can’t promise someone won’t actually use the Comments feature down there to be a dick. Up here, though, it’s safe.
I had a couple thoughts, in no particular order.
(1) I re-read the last 250 pages or so last night. Wasn’t feeling well and it seemed a nice thing to do and it was. A reservation or two about the penultimate chapter have now been put to rest. I dig this book very much, and a lot of the things I thought were great, continue to be great.
(2) I’ve been trolling a few different forums’ discussions on the topic of Deathly Hallows and I have to say, aside from the morons who exist only to ruin everyone else’s fun, most folks with a poor reaction to the book seem to be having said reaction because the final tale did not match their expectations. Which is to say, they thought X, Y and Z were going to happen and since it didn’t, they are ticked off.
It’s interesting attempting to reason with these folks. Some of them want resolution to some of their favorite characters’ storylines, and don’t get that the storylines are there, resolved or not. They’re there waiting for you to sit back on a long car ride or a rainy day (or a sunny day at the beach — wherever, really) and wonder about. This is a good thing, a very good thing indeed.
(3) This is gonna be a hell of a movie to film. Wow.
(4) A lot of folks, based on their posts, didn’t really understand the implications of a lot of things that took place in this book. Again, no spoilers or anything, but I kind of get the impression that some folks are just blowing through, waiting for the words, “and then xxxxxx died,” and not actually reading what takes place between the deaths.
The conclusion to this story was not simple. It’s not so complicated that an attentive reader can’t get it, and if you’re reading the actual words on the page, Rowling spells it out pretty straight for you.
There are deeper implications to the actions in the last few chapters in the book, though. It’s here that some folks just seem lost in the wild. What’s strange, here too, is that it seems pretty well spelled out for folks . . . maybe they’re ignoring it because, like I said up top, it’s not what they wanted it to be?
Definitely a strange phenomenon. It is kind of amusing, though, to see someone rail, incorrectly, against something that’s plainly stated and then have someone point it out to them.
Read it for yourself, though. There’s an in-depth plot-summary over on Wikipedia, but ruining a fine book and the close to an incredible story with that kind of Cliff’s Notes version . . . blech.